9/24/2023 0 Comments Jim jordan twitterOn Wednesday, Roth testified that potential Russian interference was the frame through which Twitter viewed the Post story - even though he personally did not believe the Post article broke Twitter's rules.The office of Democratic Rep. Tech companies, intelligence agencies and federal law enforcement were on edge over the possibility of a Russian "hack and leak" operation, similar to what they carried out in 2016.Ĭiting its rules against sharing hacked material containing private information, Twitter showed a warning to anyone who tried to post a link to the article saying it was "potentially harmful." It also suspended the Post's Twitter account until it deleted its tweets about the story. More recently, seizing on the Twitter Files, they've pushed the claim that the government and the Biden campaign pressured Twitter to suppress the story - even though the Twitter Files disclosures do not include any evidence that was the case.Īt the time the Post article was published, it was unclear how much of the material said to come from Hunter Biden's laptop was authentic. Republicans hold up the incident as a prime example of Silicon Valley's alleged anti-conservative bias. While Twitter quickly reversed the block on the Post article and rewrote its policies within days of the original decision, the company's botched handling of the episode has been the focus of debate and controversy for more than two years. Twitter declined to do so, but Democrats seized on her testimony to rebut Republicans' claims of political bias. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and other Democratic congresswomen.Ĭollier Navaroli also testified that the Trump White House had asked Twitter to remove a tweet by celebrity Chrissy Teigen insulting the president. While the Twitter Files disclosures highlighted requests from the Biden campaign for Twitter to review tweets that might violate its policies, the committee heard testimony that Republicans also sought to influence the platform - and that the company had even changed its policies to allow Trump to post content that broke its rules.Īnika Collier Navaroli, a former Twitter safety policy employee called as a witness by committee Democrats, told the panel that Twitter removed the phrase "go back to where you came from" from its policy barring abuse of immigrants after Trump expressed the sentiment in a 2019 tweet targeting Rep. They also showed the degree to which government officials, law enforcement and politicians regularly communicate with Twitter, along with other tech platforms, by flagging content that may violate the company's policies and sharing threat assessments. They revealed incomplete glimpses of how Twitter officials deliberated over high-profile decisions, including blocking the Post article and banning then-President Donald Trump after the Jan. The files consist of internal emails, Slack chats and other material pre-dating Musk's ownership. Untangling Disinformation Elon Musk is using the Twitter Files to discredit foes and push conspiracy theories "I'm aware of no unlawful collusion with or direction from any government agency or political campaign on how Twitter should have handled the Hunter Biden laptop situation," James Baker, who served as Twitter's deputy general counsel, told the committee. "I believe Twitter erred in this case because we wanted to avoid repeating the mistakes of 2016," Yoel Roth, Twitter's former head of trust and safety, told the panel, alluding to Russia's hacking of Democratic National Committee emails that year that were selectively leaked to the public in the final months of the campaign.īut Roth and his fellow panelists denied that decision involved government agencies or Biden's campaign. Ultimately, they said, Twitter concluded it had made the wrong call by blocking it - something Twitter's CEO at the time, Jack Dorsey, said back in late 2020. The former Twitter officials acknowledged the Post story, based on material from Hunter Biden's laptop, was the subject of fraught debate and confusion inside the company. "Immediately following the story's publication, America witnessed a coordinated campaign by social media companies, mainstream news and the intelligence community to suppress and delegitimize the existence of Hunter Biden's laptop and its contents," he said. "Twitter, under the leadership of our witnesses today, was a private company the federal government used to accomplish what it constitutionally cannot: limit the free exercise of speech," committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., said in his opening remarks. Technology Facebook And Twitter Limit Sharing 'New York Post' Story About Joe Biden
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |